A correction for this article has been published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2009, 2:17![]() ResearchArch height change during sit-to-stand: an alternative for the navicular drop test1 Gait Research Laboratory, Program in Physical Therapy, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA 2 Medoff Physical Therapy, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA 3 Department of Physiotherapy, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2008, 1:3doi:10.1186/1757-1146-1-3
AbstractBackgroundA study was conducted to determine the reliability and validity of a new foot mobility assessment method that utilizes digital images to measure the change in dorsal arch height measured at 50% of the length of the foot during the Sit-to-Stand test. MethodsTwo hundred – seventy five healthy participants participated in the study. The medial aspect of each foot was photographed with a digital camera while each participant stood with 50% body weight on each foot as well as in sitting for a non-weight bearing image. The dorsal arch height was measured at 50% of the total length of the foot on both weight bearing and non-weight bearing images to determine the change in dorsal arch height. The reliability and validity of the measurements were then determined. ResultsThe mean difference in dorsal arch height between non-weight bearing and weight bearing was 10 millimeters. The change in arch height during the Sit-to-Stand test was shown to have good to high levels of intra- and inter-reliability as well as validity using x-rays as the criterion measure. ConclusionWhile the navicular drop test has been widely used as a clinical method to assess foot mobility, poor levels of inter-rater reliability have been reported. The results of the current study suggest that the change in dorsal arch height during the Sit-to-Stand test offers the clinician a reliable and valid alternative to the navicular drop test. |





on Google Scholar










author email
corresponding author email