This article is part of the supplement: 1st Congress of the International Foot & Ankle Biomechanics (i-FAB) community

Open Access Oral presentation

Therapeutic efficiency and biomechanical effects of sport insoles in female runners

H Baur1*, A Hirschmüller2, M Jahn3, S Müller1 and F Mayer1

Author Affiliations

1 Institute of Sports Medicine and Prevention, University of Potsdam, Germany

2 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany

3 IETEC Orthopädische Einlagen GmbH & und Produktions KG, Künzell, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2008, 1(Suppl 1):O14 doi:10.1186/1757-1146-1-S1-O14


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/S1/O14


Published:26 September 2008

© 2008 Baur et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Introduction

Orthopaedic insoles are used in sports medicine practice to treat overuse injuries although clinical evidence is still lacking. There are only few randomized controlled trials with male cohorts available [1]. Moreover, biomechanical effects of insoles remain unclear. Besides mechanical effects ("alignment of the skeleton"), sensorimotor effects are discussed suggesting an influence on neuromuscular control mechanisms by altering afferent input [2]. The purpose was therefore twofold: 1. To analyze the clinical efficiency of an insole intervention in female runners with overuse complaints, 2. To assess possible neuromuscular adaptation mechanisms by wearing insoles.

Methods

48 female runners with running related overuse symptoms were randomly assigned to a control group (CO: age 35 ± 10 years, height: 1,66 ± 0,04 m, weight: 56 ± 5 kg, training km per week: 41 ± 25 km) and an insole therapy group (IN: age: 39 ± 10 years, height: 1,66 ± 0,06 m, weight: 58 ± 8 kg, training km per week: 37 ± 17 km). IN received an individually accustomed insole out of special polyurethane foam (molded, longitudinal arch support, bowl-shaped heel). All insoles were accustomed by the same orthopaedic technician. CO continued their regular training regimen without therapy, while IN used the insole for every run for 8 weeks. Both groups were analyzed on a treadmill at 12 km·h-1 pre and post intervention. Surface EMG of the lower leg muscles (M. tibialis anterior, M. peroneus longus, M. gastrocnemius medialis) was measured while subjects ran (in random order) barefoot with a reference shoe and with the individually accustomed insoles. Mean amplitude quantities (normalized to barefoot running condition) in preactivation, weight acceptance and push-off phase were extracted from EMG [3]. Functional disabilities resulting from running related injury symptoms were examined using the Pain-Disability-Index (PDI). Pain Experience Scale (SES) was used to assess current pain rating [1]. The main outcome measure (PDI sum score) was analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA (α = 0.05). SES values as well as EMG quantities were descriptively evaluated.

Results

PDI sum score decreased in IN (-40%) compared to CO (+3%) after 8 weeks (p < 0.001, Rsq = 0.81). SES values showed a decrease in subjective pain rating in IN mainly in the first two weeks of therapy. Descriptive analysis of EMG amplitudes showed no changes in M. tibialis anterior and M. gastrocnemius medialis activity. M. peroneus longus amplitudes in preactivation phase showed an increase of about 30% after intervention in IN compared to CO.

Conclusion

Orthopedic insoles molded out of polyurethane foam with longitudinal arch supports and bowl-shaped heels are able to reduce functional disabilities resulting from running related overuse injury symptoms. Therefore insoles can be used as an efficient non-surgical treatment option in female runners. Altered preactivation of the M. peroneus longus after therapy may result in optimized joint stability. This could possibly underline the concept of sensorimotor effects of orthopaedic insoles in sports.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Federal Institute of Sports Science, Germany (VF 0407/01/49/2003–2005). Insoles were supplied by IETEC Orthopädische Einlagen GmbH & Produktions KG, Künzell, Germany.

References

  1. Mayer F, et al.:

    Br J Sports Med. 2007, 41(7):e6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Nigg BM:

    Clin J Sports Med. 2001, 11:2-9. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Winter :

    Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Gait. 1991, 1-150. OpenURL