Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
 

This article is part of the supplement: 1st Congress of the International Foot & Ankle Biomechanics (i-FAB) community .

Open AccessOral presentation

The effects of taping and exercise on ankle joint movement in subjects with functional instability (FI) of the ankle joint during a jump down

Eamonn Delahunt1 email, Jeremiah O'Driscoll2 and Kieran Moran3

School of Physiotherapy and Performance Science, University College Dublin, Republic of Ireland

Mount Carmel Hospital, Republic of Ireland

School of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University, Republic of Ireland

author email corresponding author email

from 1st Congress of the International Foot & Ankle Biomechanics (i-FAB) community
Bologna, Italy. 4–6 September 2008

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2008, 1(Suppl 1):O7doi:10.1186/1757-1146-1-S1-O7

The electronic version of this abstract is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/S1/O7

Published: 26 September 2008

© 2008 Delahunt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Introduction

Ankle joint taping is a common prophylactic measure used by individuals involved in sports. Little information is available on the effects of ankle joint taping on biomechanical parameters in subjects with FI during functional activities such as jump landing. [1] Thus the aim of this study was to examine the effects of ankle joint taping and exercise on ankle joint frontal and sagittal plane movement in subjects with FI while they performed a jump landing technique.

Methods

Eleven (7 male and 4 female) subjects with a history of unilateral FI volunteered to participate in the study. FI was defined as a score of ≤ 24 of 30 on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). [2] Each subject performed three single leg sagittal plane jump landings under three conditions; condition 1 (no tape), condition 2 (tape), condition 3 (post-exercise tape). The exercise protocol between testing of condition 2 and 3 consisted of a series of hopping, ladder and cutting drills. Joint movement was measured at 250 Hz using a 12 camera motion analysis capture system (Vicon Oxford Metrics, UK), while initial contact with the ground was identified using the vertical component of ground reaction force. Ankle joint frontal and sagittal plane motion was measured at 50 ms prior to and at initial contact (IC) with the ground.

Results

There was no significant effect on ankle joint inversion, either at 50 ms prior to [F2,18 = 1.2, P = 0.32] or at IC with the ground [F2,18 = 0.4, P = 0.68]. However, there was a significant effect on the angle of ankle joint plantar flexion, both at 50 ms prior to IC [F2,18 = 29.4, P < 0.001] and at IC [F2,18 = 16.1, P < 0.001]. Post hoc analysis revealed that condition 1 (no tape) resulted in significantly greater plantar flexion at 50 ms prior to IC than condition 2 (tape) [7.7 ± 3.0°; P < 0.002] and condition 3 (post-exercise tape) [8.3 ± 4.8°; P = 0.001]. Similarly, condition 1 (no tape) resulted in significantly greater plantar flexion at IC than both condition 2 (tape) [5.3 ± 3.2°; P = 0.002] and condition 3 (post-exercise tape) [5.3 ± 4.4°; P = 0.01]. No significant differences were evident between condition 2 (tape) and condition 3 (post-exercise tape) [P > 0.05].

Conclusion

These results indicate that taping acted to reduce the degree of plantar flexion at both 50 ms prior to and at IC with the ground, and that these reductions were retained even after exercise.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the CPSM bursary of the Irish Society of Chartered Physiotherapists.

References

  1. Cordova ML, et al.:

    J Athl Train. 2002, 37:446-457. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  2. Hiller CE, et al.:

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006, 87:1235-1241. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

Have something to say? Post a comment on this article!


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.