Table 3

Individual subject rankings based on AHI during 50% WB.

Subject

AHIMS

Digital Photo

Rank Difference

AHI Value

Rank

AHI Value

Rank

D

0.309

1

0.353

1

0

J

0.309

2

0.363

4

-2

P

0.310

3

0.380

5

-2

O

0.318

4

0.320

2

2

S

0.322

5

0.401

3

2

L

0.328

6

0.359

7

-1

B

0.330

7

0.384

8

-1

H

0.337

8

0.335

6

2

A

0.339

9

0.379

11

-2

C

0.340

10

0.333

15

-5

F

0.344

11

0.397

10

1

N

0.347

12

0.349

9

3

I

0.354

13

0.389

14

-1

R

0.361

14

0.356

12

2

E

0.365

15

0.323

20

-5

T

0.371

16

0.335

16

0

K

0.372

17

0.378

19

-2

Q

0.378

18

0.372

13

5

G

0.379

19

0.330

17

2

M

0.382

20

0.383

18

2

Subjects are listed sequentially from lowest to highest values of AHI as measured using the AHIMS. The numerical rank of each subjects' AHI is also listed for the digital photographic method alongside the AHIMS rank. The rank difference was calculated the digital photographic rank subtracted from the AHIMS rank.

Pohl and Farr Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010 3:14   doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-14