Table 2 |
|||||
|
Selected results from studies using 3D scanners to measure anthropometric changes in the foot under weight bearing conditions. |
|||||
|
Percentage change in parameter |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Foot shape parameter |
Load |
Houston et al (40 feet) [38] |
Tsung et al (16 feet) [39] |
Xiong et al (60 feet) [40] |
Mean |
|
|
|||||
|
Length |
HWB |
+1.7% |
+2.7% |
+1.1% (M 1.1%, F1.1%) |
+1.53% |
|
FWB |
+2.2% |
+3.4% |
+1.4% (M1.3%; F1.5%) |
+1.95% |
|
|
Ball width |
HWB |
+3.8% |
+2.9% |
+2.2% (M2.6%; F 1.7%) |
+2.85% |
|
FWB |
+4.3% |
+6% |
+2.6% (M3.1%; F2%) |
+3.66% |
|
|
Heel width |
HWB |
+4.8% |
+5.9% |
+1.1% (M1.4%; F0.8%) |
+3.04% |
|
FWB |
+4.8% |
+8.7% |
+1.6% (M1.8%; F1.3%) |
+3.68% |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Percentage changes relate to baseline measurements taken of the unloaded foot, HWB: half weight bearing; FWB: full weight bearing. |
|||||
|
Telfer and Woodburn Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010 3:19 doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-19 |
|||||