Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: 3rd Congress of the International Foot and Ankle Biomechanics (i-FAB) Community

Open Access Poster presentation

Systematic review on the use of foot orthosis in symptomatic pes planus

Helen A Banwell*, Shylie Mackintosh and Dominic Thewlis

Author Affiliations

School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia

For all author emails, please log on.

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2012, 5(Suppl 1):P2  doi:10.1186/1757-1146-5-S1-P2


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/5/S1/P2


Published:10 April 2012

© 2012 Banwell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background

Physiologic (flexible) pes planus (flatfoot) is a descriptive term for feet that have a visually lowered medial longitudinal arch often in association with rearfoot eversion [1]. Reported to affect approximately 15% of the adult population [2] physiologic pes planus can be categorised as either symptomatic (painful, non-functional) or non-symptomatic (non-painful, functional) with the literature purporting that flexible non-symptomatic pes planus is a predominantly benign condition with no justification for intervention [3]. When pes planus is symptomatic however, functional foot orthoses are often prescribed and are the most commonly quoted intervention within the literature[4]. Despite some controversy for their use in pes planus, functional foot orthoses remain the cornerstone of podiatric management of this common disorder. The aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence for the use of foot orthoses in adults with symptomatic pes planus.

Materials and methods

A systematic review of randomised, quasi-randomised or controlled clinical trials comparing rigid or semi-rigid functional foot orthoses with: no orthoses or any other approach to managing symptomatic flexible pes planus in the adult. Relevant data bases were searched from inception to October 2011 with studies meeting the predetermined inclusion criteria retrieved and screened by two independent reviewers. No restrictions were placed on type of foot orthoses or alternative interventions. Included studies were independently assessed by two reviewers with risk of bias determined by the Cochrane criteria. Where feasible, meta-analysis will be undertaken.

Results

A narrative summary will be presented of the results with outcome measures to include: pain, gait changes (efficiency, temporal or spatial changes), dynamic foot function or static foot posture changes.

Conclusion

A determination of the current level/s of evidence for the use of foot orthoses in the adult with symptomatic pes planus.

References

  1. Otman S, Basgoze O, Gokce-Kutsal Y: Energy cost of walking with flat feet.

    Prosthet Orthot Int 1988, 12:73-76. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Kosashvili Y, et al.: The correlation between pes planus and anterior knee or intermittent low back pain.

    Foot Ankle Int 2008, 29:910-913. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Staheli LT: Planovalgus foot deformity - Current status.

    J Am Podiat Med Assn 1999, 89:94-99. OpenURL

  4. Esterman A, Pilotto L: Foot shape and its effect on functioning in Royal Australian Air Force recruits. Part 2: pilot, randomized, controlled trial of orthotics in recruits with flat feet.

    Mil Med 2005, 170:629-633. PubMed Abstract OpenURL