<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
<ui>1757-1146-5-S1-O5</ui>
<ji>1757-1146</ji>
<fm>
<dochead>Oral presentation</dochead>
<bibl>
<title>
<p>The relationship between sole curvature of roll over footwear and changes in gait</p>
</title>
<aug>
<au id="A1"><snm>Forghany</snm><fnm>Saeed</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><insr iid="I2"/></au>
<au ca="yes" id="A2"><snm>Nester</snm><fnm>Christopher</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>c.j.nester@salford.ac.uk</email></au>
<au id="A3"><snm>Richards</snm><fnm>Barry</fnm><insr iid="I1"/></au>
</aug>
<insg>
<ins id="I1"><p>School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, UK</p></ins>
<ins id="I2"><p>Musculoskeletal Research Centre, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran</p></ins>
</insg>
<source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</source>


<supplement><title><p>3rd Congress of the International Foot and Ankle Biomechanics Community</p></title><editor>Joshua Burns and Fereshteh Pourkazemi</editor><note>Meeting abstracts</note></supplement><conference><title><p>3rd Congress of the International Foot and Ankle Biomechanics Community</p></title><location>Sydney, Australia</location><date-range>11-13 March 2012</date-range><url>http://www.i-fab2012.org/</url></conference><issn>1757-1146</issn>
<pubdate>2012</pubdate>
<volume>5</volume>
<issue>Suppl 1</issue>
<fpage>O5</fpage>
<url>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/5/S1/O5</url>
<xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1757-1146-5-S1-O5</pubid></xrefbib></bibl>
<history><pub><date><day>10</day><month>4</month><year>2012</year></date></pub></history>
<cpyrt><year>2012</year><collab>Forghany et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
</fm>
<bdy>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Background</p>
</st>
<p>Footwear with a curved sole profile remains popular and there is evidence of its effects on gait and posture <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Existing literature describes how different styles of roll over footwear affect gait, although the effects of the precise radii of the curve of the sole on the gait rocker function and other reported effects have not been investigated. The aim of this study was to relate the radii of the soles of two roll over footwear products to their effects on walking.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Materials and methods</p>
</st>
<p>Lower limb kinematic and GRF data was collected from twenty subjects during walking in four footwear conditions: flat control shoe, weighted flat control shoe, the new prototype rollover shoe and a MBT shoe. The static sole radii of all footwear was calculated for all and distinct parts of the sole, and correlated with radii of the gait rollover shapes as described by Hansen et al <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<p>The radii of the foot&#8211;shoe roll-over shapes were significantly changed in response to different shoe conditions (p&lt;0.001), but leg and thigh radii were not. The MBT shoes demonstrated a low positive correlation between the radius of foot-shoe roll-over shape and the static sole radii (whole sole) (r = 0.32; p = 0.04) and the radii of the heel area of the sole (r = 0.39; p = 0.01). The new prototype shoes showed no statistically significant correlations.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusion</p>
</st>
<p>The results of this study indicate that the static curve of the sole is not the main factor influencing gait. It appears that the extent to which the curved sole deforms dynamically during gait (i.e. shoe bending stiffness) influences the strength of the relationship between sole curvature and changes in gait.</p>
</sec>
</bdy>
<bm>
<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Effect of an unstable shoe construction on lower extremity gait characteristics</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nigg</snm><fnm/></au><etal/></aug><source>Clin Biomech</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>82</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.013</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Changes in gait and EMG when walking with the Masai Barefoot Technique</p></title><aug><au><snm>Romkes</snm><fnm/></au><etal/></aug><source>Clin Biomech</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>75</fpage><lpage>81</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.003</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Effects of shoe heel height on biologic rollover characteristics during walking</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hansen</snm><fnm/></au><etal/></aug><source>J Rehabil Res Dev</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>41</volume><fpage>547</fpage><lpage>554</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1682/JRRD.2003.06.0098</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15558383</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Effective rocker shapes used by able-bodied persons for walking and fore-aft swaying: Implications for design of ankle&#8211;foot prostheses</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hansen</snm><fnm/></au><etal/></aug><source>Gait Posture</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>32</volume><fpage>181</fpage><lpage>184</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.04.014</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2906615</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20471833</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
</bm>
</art>