<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</description>
        <dc:date>2013-05-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/21" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/20" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/12" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/21">
        <title>Dermatology within the UK podiatric literature: a content analysis (1989-2010)</title>
        <description>Background:
Although dermatology, as a medical subject, has been a facet of the training and education of podiatrists for many years, it is, arguably, only in recent years that the speciality of podiatric dermatology has emerged within the profession. Some indication of this gradual development may be identified through a content analysis of the podiatric literature in the UK, spanning a 21 year timeframe.Method6 key professional journals were selected for content analysis in order to provide a picture of the emergence and development of podiatric dermatology over a period extending from 1989 to 2010. Both syntactical and thematic unitization were deployed in the analysis, revealing both manifest and latent content. Categories were devised using a prior coding, a codebook produced to define relevant concepts and category characteristics, and the coding scheme subject to an assessment of reliability.
Results:
1611 units appeared in the 6 journals across a 21 year timeframe. 88%(n = 1417) occurred in one journal (Podiatry Now and its predecessors). Modal categories within all journals included course adverts (n = 673), commercial adverts (n = 562) and articles by podiatrists (n = 133). There was an overall rise from 40 per annum in 1989, to over 100 in 2010. A wider range of dermatological topics were addressed, ranging from fungal nail infections to melanoma.
Conclusions:
It is evident from this analysis that there has been an increasing focus on dermatology as a topic within the main podiatric journals in the UK over the last 21 years, primarily reflecting a rise in commercial advertising and an increase in academic dermatology related publications. Whilst earlier publications tended to focus on warts and fungal infections, more recent publications address a broader spectrum of topics. Changes in prescribing rights may be relevant to these findings, as may the enhanced professional and regulatory body requirements on continuing professional development.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/21</link>
                <dc:creator>Ivan Bristow</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alan Borthwick</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2013, null:21</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-6-21</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-6-21-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/20">
        <title>The effects of prolonged running on foot posture: a repeated measures study of half marathon runners using the foot posture index and navicular height</title>
        <description>Background:
Different foot postures are associated with alterations in foot function, kinetics and the subsequent occurrence of injury. Little is known about changes in foot posture following prolonged weightbearing exercise. This study aimed to identify changes in foot posture after running a half marathon.
Methods:
Foot posture was measured using the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) and navicular height in thirty volunteer participants before and after running a half marathon. FPI-6 scores were converted to Rasch logit values and means compared for these and navicular height using an ANOVA.
Results:
There was a 5 mm drop in navicular height in both feet when measured after the half marathon (P &lt; 0.05). The FPI-6 showed a side x time interaction with an increase in score indicating a more &apos;pronated&apos; position in the left foot of + 2 [Rasch value + 1.7] but no change in the right foot (+ 0.4 [+ 0.76]) following the half marathon.
Conclusion:
The apparent differences between the FPI-6 and navicular height on the right foot may be because the FPI-6 takes soft tissue contour changes into consideration whilst the navicular height focuses on skeletal changes. The changes in foot posture towards a more pronated position may have implications for foot function, and therefore risk of injury; shoe fit and comfort and also the effect of therapeutic orthoses worn during prolonged running.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/20</link>
                <dc:creator>Emma Cowley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jonathan Marsden</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2013, null:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-6-20</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-6-20-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/19">
        <title>The effect of customised and sham foot orthoses on plantar pressures</title>
        <description>Background:
The effectiveness of foot orthoses has been evaluated in many clinical trials with sham foot orthoses used as the control intervention in at least 10 clinical trials. However, the mechanical effects and credibility of sham orthoses has been rarely quantified. This study aimed to: (i) compare the effects on plantar pressures of three sham foot orthoses to a customised foot orthosis, and (ii) establish the perceived credibility and the expected benefit of each orthotic condition.
Methods:
Thirty adults aged between 18 and 51 participated in this study. At 0 and 4&#160;weeks, plantar pressure data were collected for the heel, midfoot and forefoot using the pedar&#174;-X in-shoe system for the following five randomly assigned conditions: (i) shoe alone, (ii) customised foot orthosis, (iii) contoured polyethylene sham foot orthosis, (iv) contoured EVA sham foot orthosis, and (v) flat EVA sham foot orthosis. At the initial data collection session, each participant completed a Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) to determine the credibility and expected benefit of each orthotic condition.
Results:
Compared to the shoe alone at week 0, the contoured polyethylene sham orthosis was the only condition to not significantly effect peak pressure at any region of the foot. In contrast, the contoured EVA sham orthosis, the flat EVA sham orthosis and the customised orthosis significantly reduced peak pressure at the heel. At the medial midfoot, all sham orthoses provided the same effect as the shoe alone, which corresponded to effects that were significantly different to the customised orthosis. There were no differences in peak pressure between conditions at the other mask regions, the lateral midfoot and forefoot. When the conditions were compared at week 4, the differences between the conditions were generally similar to the findings observed at week 0. With respect to credibility and expected benefit, all orthotic conditions were considered the same with the exception of the contoured polyethylene sham orthosis, which was perceived as being less credible and less likely to provide benefits.
Conclusion:
The findings of this study indicate that all of the sham orthoses tested provided the same effect on plantar pressures at the midfoot and forefoot as a shoe alone. However, the contoured EVA sham orthosis and the flat EVA sham orthosis significantly reduced peak pressure under the heel, which was similar to the customised orthosis. In contrast, the contoured polyethylene sham orthosis had no significant effect on plantar pressure and was comparable to the shoe alone at all regions of the foot. Hence, lower plantar pressures were found under the heel with some sham orthoses, but not with others. Importantly, participants perceived the polyethylene sham orthosis &#8211; the sham that had no effect on plantar pressure &#8211; to be the least credible orthosis and the least likely to provide benefits. This may be critical for the design of future clinical trials as it may introduce confounding effects that produce inaccurate results. These findings provide some evidence for the mechanical effects, treatment credibility and expected benefit of sham foot orthoses, which should be considered when they are used as a control intervention in a clinical trial.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/19</link>
                <dc:creator>Chris McCormick</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Bonanno</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karl Landorf</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2013, null:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-6-19</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Developing &apos;sham&apos; orthoses for use in clinical trials</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>McCormick and colleagues report on the mechanical effects and perceived credibility of a range of &apos;sham orthoses&apos;, and conclude that a contoured polyethylene orthosis is the most appropriate
comparator device in clinical trials where a small mechanical effect across all regions of the foot is desired.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-6-19-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/18">
        <title>Factors affecting center of pressure in older adults: the Framingham Foot Study</title>
        <description>Background:
Although aberrant foot movement during gait has been associated with adverse outcomes in the lower extremities in clinical patients, few studies have analyzed population differences in foot function. The purpose of this study was to assess demographic differences in foot function in a large population-based study of community-dwelling adults.
Methods:
Participants in this study were from the Framingham Foot Study. Walking data were collected from both feet using a Tekscan Matscan pressure mat. Foot function was characterized using the center of pressure excursion index (CPEI). T-tests were used to assess differences between population subsets based on sex, and in men and women separately, age, body mass index (BMI), physical activity and in women, past high heel use.
Results:
There were 2111 participants included in this analysis. Significant differences in CPEI were noted by sex (p&lt; 0.0001), by age in women (p = 0.04), and by past high heel use in women (p = 0.04).
Conclusions:
Foot function during gait was affected by sex, as well as by age and shoe-wear in women, but not by BMI or physical activity. Future work will evaluate possible relations between CPEI and outcomes such as falls, sarcopenia, and lower extremity function.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Hagedorn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alyssa Dufour</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yvonne Golightly</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jody Riskowski</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Howard Hillstrom</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Virginia Casey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marian Hannan</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2013, null:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-6-18</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-6-18-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/17">
        <title>Foot orthoses for the management of low back pain: a qualitative approach capturing the patient&#191;s perspective</title>
        <description>Background:
The onset of non specific low back pain is associated with heavy lifting, age, female gender, and poor general health, with psychological factors being predictors of it becoming chronic. Additionally, it is thought that altered lower limb biomechanics are a contributory factor, with foot orthoses increasingly being considered as an appropriate intervention by physiotherapists and podiatrists. However, research into the effect of foot orthoses is inconclusive, primarily focusing on the biomechanical effect and not the symptomatic relief from the patient&#8217;s perspective. The aim of this study was to explore the breadth of patients&#8217; experiences of being provided with foot orthoses and to evaluate any changes in their back pain following this experience.MethodFollowing ethical approval, participants (n&#8201;=&#8201;25) with non-specific low back pain associated with altered lower limb biomechanics were provided with customised foot orthoses. At 16&#160;weeks after being provided with the foot orthoses, conversational style interviews were carried out with each patient. An interpretivistic phenomenological approach was adopted for the data collection and analysis.
Results:
For these participants, foot orthoses appeared to be effective. However, the main influence on this outcome was the consultation process and a patient focussed approach. The consultation was an opportunity for fostering mutual understanding, with verbal and visual explanation reassuring the patient and this influenced the patient&#8217;s beliefs, their engagement with the foot orthoses (physical) and their experience of low back pain (psychological).
Conclusion:
Clinicians need to adopt &#8216;psychologically informed practice&#8217; in relation to the provision of foot orthoses. Likewise, researchers should consider all the influencing factors found in this study, both in relation to their study protocol and the outcomes they plan to measure.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/17</link>
                <dc:creator>Anita Williams</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lindsay Hill</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Nester</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2013, null:17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-6-17</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-6-17-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/16">
        <title>&#191;Effectiveness of interventions in reducing pain and maintaining physical activity in children and adolescents with calcaneal apophysitis (Sever&#191;s disease): a systematic review&#191;</title>
        <description>Background:
Calcaneal apophysitis, also commonly known as sever&#8217;s disease, is a condition seen in children usually aged between 8&#8211;15&#8201;years. Conservative therapies, such as taping, heel lifts and orthotic intervention are accepted management practices for calcaneal apophysitis, though there is very little high quality research examining the efficacy of such treatment modalities. Previous narrative literature reviews and opinion pieces provide some evidence for the use of heel raises or orthoses. The aim of this manuscript was to complete a systemic review on the treatment options for calcaneal apophysitis as measured by pain reduction and maintenance of physical activity.
Methods:
A search strategy completed by two reviewers examined nine databases from inception to May 2012. Search terms included heel pain, children, adolescent, calcaneal apophysitis, sever&#8217;s disease, treatment, and management (full text publications, human studies). Systematic reviews, randomised control trials, case series, and case studies were included. The reference lists of the selected articles were also examined. The methodology, quality and risk of bias was examined and assessed using the PEDro scale.
Results:
Nine articles were retrieved including three clinical trials involving randomisation, two case series, two retrospective case reviews, and two case reports. Effect size calculations and a meta analysis were unable to be completed due to the limited data reported within the literature. Numerous treatment options were reported throughout the literature, though few were examined against a control or alternate treatment option in well-designed trials. The limited evidence indicated that orthoses provided greater short-term pain relief than heel raises. Health practitioners should view these results with caution, as there were apparent methodological problems with the employed study design and limited follow-up of participants.
Conclusion:
There is limited evidence to support the use of heel raises and orthoses for children who have heel pain related to calcaneal apophysitis. Further research is needed to generate higher quality evidence with larger sample sizes, and validated measures of pain and function to establish effective treatment approaches for children with calcaneal apophysitis.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Alicia James</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cylie Williams</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Terry Haines</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2013, null:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-6-16</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-6-16-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/15">
        <title>Training the next generation of clinical researchers: evaluation of a graduate podiatrist research internship in rheumatology</title>
        <description>Background:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Arthritis Research UK funded graduate internship scheme for podiatrists and to explore the experiences of interns and mentors.
Methods:
Nine new graduates completed the internship programme (July 2006&#8211;June 2010); six interns and two mentors participated in this study. The study was conducted in three phases. Phase 1: quantitative survey of career and research outcomes for interns. Phase 2 and 3: qualitative asynchronous interviews through email to explore the experiences of interns and mentors. Interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) of coded transcripts identified recurring themes.
Results:
Research outputs included ten peer reviewed publications with authorial contributions from interns, 23 conference abstract presentations and one subsequent &#8216;Jewel in the Crown&#8217; award at the British Society for Rheumatology Conference. Career progression includes two National Institute for Health research (NIHR) PhD fellowships, two Arthritis Research UK PhD fellowships, one NIHR Master of Research fellowship and one specialist rheumatology clinical post. Two interns are members of NIHR and professional body committees.Seven important themes arose from the qualitative phases: perceptions of the internship pre-application; internship values; maximising personal and professional development; psychosocial components of the internship; the role of mentoring and networking; access to research career pathways; perceptions of future developments for the internship programme. The role of mentorship and the peer support network have had benefits that have persisted beyond the formal period of the scheme.
Conclusions:
The internship model appears to have been perceived to have been valuable to the interns&#8217; careers and may have contributed significantly to the broader building of capacity in clinical research in foot and ankle rheumatology. We believe the model has potential to be transferable across health disciplines and on national and international scales.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Serena Naidoo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Catherine Bowen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nigel Arden</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anthony Redmond</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2013, null:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-6-15</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-6-15-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/14">
        <title>Reliability and validity of the Microsoft Kinect for evaluating static foot posture</title>
        <description>Background:
The evaluation of foot posture in a clinical setting is useful to screen for potential injury, however disagreement remains as to which method has the greatest clinical utility. An inexpensive and widely available imaging system, the Microsoft Kinect&#8482;, may possess the characteristics to objectively evaluate static foot posture in a clinical setting with high accuracy. The aim of this study was to assess the intra-rater reliability and validity of this system for assessing static foot posture.
Methods:
Three measures were used to assess static foot posture; traditional visual observation using the Foot Posture Index (FPI), a 3D motion analysis (3DMA) system and software designed to collect and analyse image and depth data from the Kinect. Spearman&#8217;s rho was used to assess intra-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the Kinect to evaluate foot posture, and a linear regression was used to examine the ability of the Kinect to predict total visual FPI score.
Results:
The Kinect demonstrated moderate to good intra-rater reliability for four FPI items of foot posture (&#961;&#8201;=&#8201;0.62 to 0.78) and moderate to good correlations with the 3DMA system for four items of foot posture (&#961;&#8201;=&#8201;0.51 to 0.85). In contrast, intra-rater reliability of visual FPI items was poor to moderate (&#961;&#8201;=&#8201;0.17 to 0.63), and correlations with the Kinect and 3DMA systems were poor (absolute &#961;&#8201;=&#8201;0.01 to 0.44). Kinect FPI items with moderate to good reliability predicted 61% of the variance in total visual FPI score.
Conclusions:
The majority of the foot posture items derived using the Kinect were more reliable than the traditional visual assessment of FPI, and were valid when compared to a 3DMA system. Individual foot posture items recorded using the Kinect were also shown to predict a moderate degree of variance in the total visual FPI score. Combined, these results support the future potential of the Kinect to accurately evaluate static foot posture in a clinical setting.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Benjamin Mentiplay</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ross Clark</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alexandra Mullins</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adam Bryant</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Simon Bartold</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kade Paterson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2013, null:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-6-14</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-6-14-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/13">
        <title>Correction: A survey of foot problems in community-dwelling older Greek Australians</title>
        <description>Since the publication of our Research article [1], the copyright of the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index (MFPDI) now states a licence agreement is required for publication. As a result, Additional file 2 has been removed, the English language version of the MFPDI can be found through the ISIS Outcomes website [2].</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Patricia Kaoulla</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nicoletta Frescos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hylton Menz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2013, null:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-6-13</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-6-13-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/12">
        <title>Reliability of ultrasound to measure morphology of the toe flexor muscles</title>
        <description>Background:
Measuring the strength of individual foot muscles is very challenging; however, measuring muscle morphology has been shown to be associated with strength. A reliable method of assessing foot muscle atrophy and hypertrophy would therefore be beneficial to researchers and clinicians. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the test-retest intra-observer reliability of ultrasound to measure the morphology of the primary toe flexor muscles.MethodThe abductor hallucis, flexor hallucis brevis, flexor digitorum brevis, quadratus plantae and abductor digiti minimi muscles in the foot, and the flexor digitorum longus and flexor hallucis longus muscles in the shank were assessed in five males and five females (mean age&#8201;=&#8201;32.1&#8201;&#177;&#8201;10.1&#160;years). Muscles were imaged using a GE Venue 40 ultrasound (6-9 or 7.6-10.7&#160;MHz transducer) in a random order, and on two occasions 1-6&#160;days apart. Muscle thickness and cross-sectional area were measured using Image J software with the assessor blinded to muscle and day of scan. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and limits of agreement were calculated to assess day-to-day repeatability of the measurements.
Results:
The method was found to have good reliability (ICC&#8201;=&#8201;0.89-0.99) with limits of agreement between 8-28% of the relative muscle size.
Conclusion:
The protocol described in this paper showed that ultrasound is a reliable method to measure morphology of the toe flexor muscles. The portability and advantages of ultrasound make it a useful tool for clinical and research settings.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/6/1/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Karen Mickle</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Nester</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gillian Crofts</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julie Steele</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2013, null:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-6-12</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-6-12-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
