<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</description>
        <dc:date>2010-03-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/23" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/32" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/35" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/24" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/22" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/3">
        <title>Heel raises versus prefabricated orthoses in the treatment of posterior heel pain associated with calcaneal apophysitis (Sever&apos;s Disease): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial</title>
        <description>Background:
Posterior Heel pain can present in children of 8 to 14 years, associated with or clinically diagnosed as Sever&apos;s disease, or calcaneal apophysitis. Presently, there are no comparative randomised studies evaluating treatment options for posterior heel pain in children with the clinical diagnosis of calcaneal apophysitis or Sever&apos;s disease. This study seeks to compare the clinical efficacy of some currently employed treatment options for the relief of disability and pain associated with posterior heel pain in children.MethodDesign: Factorial 2 &#215; 2 randomised controlled trial with monthly follow-up for 3 months.Participants: Children with clinically diagnosed posterior heel pain possibly associated with calcaneal apophysitis/Sever&apos;s disease (n = 124).Interventions: Treatment factor 1 will be two types of shoe orthoses: a heel raise or prefabricated orthoses. Both of these interventions are widely available, mutually exclusive treatment approaches that are relatively low in cost. Treatment factor 2 will be a footwear prescription/replacement intervention involving a shoe with a firm heel counter, dual density EVA midsole and rear foot control. The alternate condition in this factor is no footwear prescription/replacement, with the participant wearing their current footwear.Outcomes: Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire and the Faces pain scale.DiscussionThis will be a randomised trial to compare the efficacy of various treatment options for posterior heel pain in children that may be associated with calcaneal apophysitis also known as Sever&apos;s disease.Trial RegistrationTrial Number: ACTRN12609000696291Ethics Approval Southern Health: HREC Ref: 09271B</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Alicia James</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cylie Williams</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Terry Haines</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-03-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-03-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/23">
        <title>Foot orthoses: how much customisation is necessary?</title>
        <description>The relative merit of customised versus prefabricated foot orthoses continues to be the subject of passionate debate among foot health professionals. Although there is currently insufficient evidence to reach definitive conclusions, a growing body of research literature suggests that prefabricated foot orthoses may produce equivalent clinical outcomes to customised foot orthoses for some conditions. Consensus guidelines for the prescription of customised foot orthoses need to be developed so that the hypothesised benefits of these devices can be thoroughly evaluated.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/23</link>
                <dc:creator>Hylton Menz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2009, 2:23</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-2-23</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/2">
        <title>Combined rotation scarf and Akin osteotomies for hallux valgus: a patient focussed 9 year follow up of 50 patients

</title>
        <description>Background:
The Cochrane review of hallux valgus surgery has disputed the scientific validity of hallux valgus research. Scoring systems and surrogate measures such as x-ray angles are commonly reported at just one year post operatively but these are of dubious relevance to the patient. In this study we extended the follow up to a minimum of 8 years and sought to address patient specific concerns with hallux valgus surgery. The long term follow up also allowed a comprehensive review of the complications associated with the combined rotation scarf and Akin osteotomies.
Methods:
Between 1996 and 1999, 101 patients underwent rotation scarf and Akin osteotomies for the treatment of hallux valgus. All patients were contacted and asked to participate in this study. 50 female participants were available allowing review of 73 procedures. The average follow up was over 9 years and the average age at the time of surgery was 57. The participants were physically examined and interviewed.
Results:
Post-operatively, in 86% of the participants there were no footwear restrictions. Stiffness of the first metatarsophalangeal joint was reported in 8% (6 feet); 10% were unhappy with the cosmetic appearance of their feet, 3 feet had hallux varus, and 2 feet had recurrent hallux valgus. There were no foot-related activity restrictions in 92% of the group. Metatarsalgia occurred in 4% (3 feet). 96% were better than before surgery and 88% were completely satisfied with their post-operative result. Hallux varus was the greatest single cause of dissatisfaction. The most common adverse event in the study was internal fixation irritation. Hallux valgus surgery is not without risk and these findings could be useful in the informed consent process.
Conclusions:
When combined the rotation scarf and Akin osteotomies are an effective treatment for hallux valgus that achieves good long-term correction with a low incidence of recurrence, footwear restriction or metatarsalgia. The nature of the osteotomies allows early return to normal shoes and activity without the need for postoperative immobilisation in a plaster cast.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Tim Kilmartin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claire O'Kane</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/32">
        <title>Diagnostic imaging for chronic plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title>
        <description>Background:
Chronic plantar heel pain (CPHP) is a generalised term used to describe a range of undifferentiated conditions affecting the plantar heel. Plantar fasciitis is reported as the most common cause and the terms are frequently used interchangeably in the literature. Diagnostic imaging has been used by many researchers and practitioners to investigate the involvement of specific anatomical structures in CPHP. These observations help to explain the underlying pathology of the disorder, and are of benefit in forming an accurate diagnosis and targeted treatment plan. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the diagnostic imaging features associated with CPHP, and evaluate study findings by meta-analysis where appropriate.
Methods:
Bibliographic databases including Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SportDiscus and The Cochrane Library were searched electronically on March 25, 2009. Eligible articles were required to report imaging findings in participants with CPHP unrelated to inflammatory arthritis, and to compare these findings with a control group. Methodological quality was evaluated by use of the Quality Index as described by Downs and Black. Meta-analysis of study data was conducted where appropriate.
Results:
Plantar fascia thickness as measured by ultrasonography was the most widely reported imaging feature. Meta-analysis revealed that the plantar fascia of CPHP participants was 2.16 mm thicker than control participants (95% CI = 1.60 to 2.71 mm, P &lt; 0.001) and that CPHP participants were more likely to have plantar fascia thickness values greater than 4.0 mm (OR = 105.11, 95% CI = 3.09 to 3577.28, P = 0.01). CPHP participants were also more likely to show radiographic evidence of subcalcaneal spur than control participants (OR = 8.52, 95% CI = 4.08 to 17.77, P &lt; 0.001).
Conclusion:
This systematic review has identified 23 studies investigating the diagnostic imaging appearance of the plantar fascia and inferior calcaneum in people with CPHP. Analysis of these studies found that people with CPHP are likely to have a thickened plantar fascia with associated fluid collection, and that thickness values &gt;4.0 mm are diagnostic of plantar fasciitis. Additionally, subcalcaneal spur formation is strongly associated with pain beneath the heel.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/32</link>
                <dc:creator>Andrew McMillan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karl Landorf</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joanna Barrett</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hylton Menz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adam Bird</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2009, 2:32</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-2-32</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>32</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/35">
        <title>Foot posture influences the electromyographic activity of selected lower limb muscles during gait</title>
        <description>Background:
Some studies have found that flat-arched foot posture is related to altered lower limb muscle function compared to normal- or high-arched feet. However, the results from these studies were based on highly selected populations such as those with rheumatoid arthritis. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare lower limb muscle function of normal and flat-arched feet in people without pain or disease.
Methods:
Sixty adults aged 18 to 47 years were recruited to this study. Of these, 30 had normal-arched feet (15 male and 15 female) and 30 had flat-arched feet (15 male and 15 female). Foot posture was classified using two clinical measurements (the arch index and navicular height) and four skeletal alignment measurements from weightbearing foot x-rays. Intramuscular fine-wire electrodes were inserted into tibialis posterior and peroneus longus under ultrasound guidance, and surface EMG activity was recorded from tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius while participants walked barefoot at their self-selected comfortable walking speed. Time of peak amplitude, peak and root mean square (RMS) amplitude were assessed from stance phase EMG data. Independent samples t-tests were performed to assess for significant differences between the normal- and flat-arched foot posture groups.
Results:
During contact phase, the flat-arched group exhibited increased activity of tibialis anterior (peak amplitude; 65 versus 46% of maximum voluntary isometric contraction) and decreased activity of peroneus longus (peak amplitude; 24 versus 37% of maximum voluntary isometric contraction). During midstance/propulsion, the flat-arched group exhibited increased activity of tibialis posterior (peak amplitude; 86 versus 60% of maximum voluntary isometric contraction) and decreased activity of peroneus longus (RMS amplitude; 25 versus 39% of maximum voluntary isometric contraction). Effect sizes for these significant findings ranged from 0.48 to 1.3, representing moderate to large differences in muscle activity between normal-arched and flat-arched feet.
Conclusion:
Differences in muscle activity in people with flat-arched feet may reflect neuromuscular compensation to reduce overload of the medial longitudinal arch. Further research is required to determine whether these differences in muscle function are associated with injury.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/35</link>
                <dc:creator>George Murley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hylton Menz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karl Landorf</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2009, 2:35</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-2-35</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>35</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/1/7">
        <title>Plantar calcaneal spurs in older people: longitudinal traction or vertical compression?</title>
        <description>Background:
Plantar calcaneal spurs are common, however their pathophysiology is poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and correlates of plantar calcaneal spurs in a large sample of older people.
Methods:
Weightbearing lateral foot radiographs of 216 people (140 women and 76 men) aged 62 to 94 years (mean age 75.9, SD 6.6) were examined for plantar calcaneal and Achilles tendon spurs. Associations between the presence of spurs and sex, body mass index, radiographic measures of foot posture, self-reported co-morbidities and current or previous heel pain were then explored.
Results:
Of the 216 participants, 119 (55%) had at least one plantar calcaneal spur and 103 (48%) had at least one Achilles tendon spur. Those with plantar calcaneal spurs were more likely to have Achilles tendon spurs (odds ratio [OR] = 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 3.5). Prevalence of spurs did not differ according to sex. Participants with plantar calcaneal spurs were more likely to be obese (OR = 7.9, 95% CI 3.6 to 17.0), report osteoarthritis (OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.6 to 4.8) and have current or previous heel pain (OR = 4.6, 95% CI 2.3 to 9.4). No relationship was found between the presence of calcaneal spurs and radiographic measures of foot posture.
Conclusion:
Calcaneal spurs are common in older men and women and are related to obesity, osteoarthritis and current or previous heel pain, but are unrelated to radiographic measurements of foot posture. These findings support the theory that plantar calcaneal spurs may be an adaptive response to vertical compression of the heel rather than longitudinal traction at the calcaneal enthesis.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Hylton Menz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gerard Zammit</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karl Landorf</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shannon Munteanu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2008, 1:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-08-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-1-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/24">
        <title>Tibialis posterior in health and disease: a review of structure and function with specific reference to electromyographic studies</title>
        <description>Tibialis posterior has a vital role during gait as the primary dynamic stabiliser of the medial longitudinal arch; however, the muscle and tendon are prone to dysfunction with several conditions. We present an overview of tibialis posterior muscle and tendon anatomy with images from cadaveric work on fresh frozen limbs and a review of current evidence that define normal and abnormal tibialis posterior muscle activation during gait. A video is available that demonstrates ultrasound guided intra-muscular insertion techniques for tibialis posterior electromyography.Current electromyography literature indicates tibialis posterior intensity and timing during walking is variable in healthy adults and has a disease-specific activation profile among different pathologies. Flat-arched foot posture and tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction are associated with greater tibialis posterior muscle activity during stance phase, compared to normal or healthy participants, respectively. Cerebral palsy is associated with four potentially abnormal profiles during the entire gait cycle; however it is unclear how these profiles are defined as these studies lack control groups that characterise electromyographic activity from developmentally normal children. Intervention studies show antipronation taping to significantly decrease tibialis posterior muscle activation during walking compared to barefoot, although this research is based on only four participants. However, other interventions such as foot orthoses and footwear do not appear to systematically effect muscle activation during walking or running, respectively. This review highlights deficits in current evidence and provides suggestions for the future research agenda.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/24</link>
                <dc:creator>Ruth Semple</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>George Murley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Woodburn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Deborah Turner</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2009, 2:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-2-24</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/1">
        <title>Non-medical prescribing in Australasia and the UK: the case of podiatry</title>
        <description>Background:
The last decade has witnessed a rapid transformation in the role boundaries of the allied health professions, enabled through the creation of new roles and the expansion of existing, traditional roles. A strategy of health care &apos;modernisation&apos; has encompassed calls for the redrawing of professional boundaries and identities, linked with demands for greater workforce flexibility. Several tasks and roles previously within the exclusive domain of medicine have been delegated to, or assumed by, allied health professionals, as the workforce is reshaped to meet the challenges posed by changing demographic, social and political contexts. The prescribing of medicines by non-medically qualified healthcare professionals, and in particular the podiatry profession, reflects these changes.
Methods:
Using a range of key primary documentary sources derived from published material in the public domain and unpublished material in private possession, this paper traces the development of contemporary UK and Australasian podiatric prescribing, access, supply and administration of medicines. Documentary sources include material from legislative, health policy, regulatory and professional bodies (including both State and Federal sources in Australia).
Results:
Tracing a chronological, comparative, socio-historical account of the emergence and development of &apos;prescribing&apos; in podiatry in both Australasia and the UK enables an analysis of the impact of health policy reforms on the use of, and access to, medicines by podiatrists. The advent of neo-liberal healthcare policies, coupled with demands for workforce flexibility and role transfer within a climate of demographic, economic and social change has enabled allied health professionals to undertake an expanding number of tasks involving the sale, supply, administration and prescription of medicines.
Conclusion:
As a challenge to medical dominance, these changes, although driven by wider healthcare policy, have met with resistance. As anticipated in the theory of medical dominance, inter-professional jurisdictional disputes centred on the right to access, administer, supply and prescribe medicines act as obstacles to workforce change. Nevertheless, the broader policy agenda continues to ensure workforce redesign in which podiatry has assumed wider roles and responsibilities in prescribing.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Alan Borthwick</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anthony Short</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Nancarrow</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rosalie Boyce</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/1/11">
        <title>Acral lentiginous melanoma of the foot and ankle: A case series and review of the literature</title>
        <description>Background:
Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is an uncommon, cutaneous malignant tumour which may arise on the foot. Its relative rarity, atypical appearance and late presentation frequently serve as poor prognostic indicators.
Methods:
At a tertiary skin tumour centre, a retrospective review was undertaken of all patients diagnosed with the tumour at the level of ankle or below.
Results:
Over a six year period, 27 cases (20 female, 7 male) were identified with positive histology confirming the disease. The age ranged from 35&#8211;96 years of age (mean 62.7 years). The majority of the cohort were white (59%) with plantar lesions (62%). 33% of patients were initially were diagnosed incorrectly. The average time taken from the point of recognition, by the patient, to the lesion being correctly diagnosed was around 13.5 months.
Conclusion:
Earlier diagnosis of ALM requires education at both a patient and practitioner level.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Ivan Bristow</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katharine Acland</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2008, 1:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-09-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-1-11</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-09-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/22">
        <title>A protocol for classifying normal- and flat-arched foot posture for research studies using clinical and radiographic measurements</title>
        <description>Background:
There are several clinical and radiological methods available to classify foot posture in research, however there is no clear strategy for selecting the most appropriate measurements. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a foot screening protocol to distinguish between participants with normal- and flat-arched feet who would then subsequently be recruited into a series of laboratory-based gait studies.
Methods:
The foot posture of ninety-one asymptomatic young adults was assessed using two clinical measurements (normalised navicular height and arch index) and four radiological measurements taken from antero-posterior and lateral x-rays (talus-second metatarsal angle, talo-navicular coverage angle, calcaneal inclination angle and calcaneal-first metatarsal angle). Normative foot posture values were taken from the literature and used to recruit participants with normal-arched feet. Data from these participants were subsequently used to define the boundary between normal- and flat-arched feet. This information was then used to recruit participants with flat-arched feet. The relationship between the clinical and radiographic measures of foot posture was also explored.
Results:
Thirty-two participants were recruited to the normal-arched study, 31 qualified for the flat-arched study and 28 participants were classified as having neither normal- or flat-arched feet and were not suitable for either study. The values obtained from the two clinical and four radiological measurements established two clearly defined foot posture groups. Correlations among clinical and radiological measures were significant (p &lt; 0.05) and ranged from r = 0.24 to 0.70. Interestingly, the clinical measures were more strongly associated with the radiographic angles obtained from the lateral view.
Conclusion:
This foot screening protocol provides a coherent strategy for researchers planning to recruit participants with normal- and flat-arched feet. However, further research is required to determine whether foot posture variations in the sagittal, transverse or both planes provide the best descriptor of the flat foot.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/22</link>
                <dc:creator>George Murley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hylton Menz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karl Landorf</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2009, 2:22</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-2-22</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
