<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</description>
        <dc:date>2012-01-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/5/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/5/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/4/1/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/4/1/25" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/4/1/26" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/22" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/5/1/1">
        <title>The foot posture index, ankle lunge test, Beighton scale and the lower limb 

assessment score in healthy children: a reliability study
</title>
        <description>Background:
Outcome measures are important when evaluating treatments and physiological progress in paediatric populations. Reliable, relevant measures of foot posture are important for such assessments to be accurate over time. The aim of the study was to assess the intra- and inter-rater reliability of common outcome measures for paediatric foot conditions.
Methods:
A repeated measures, same-subject design assessed the intra- and inter-rater reliability of measures of foot posture, joint hypermobility and ankle range: the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6), the ankle lunge test, the Beighton scale and the lower limb assessment scale (LLAS), used by two examiners in 30 healthy children (aged 7 to 15 years). The Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire (OxAFQ-C) was completed by participants and a parent, to assess the extent of foot and ankle problems.
Results:
The OxAFQ-C demonstrated a mean (SD) score of 6 (6) in adults and 7(5) for children, showing good agreement between parents and children, and which indicates mid-range (transient) disability. Intra-rater reliability was good for the FPI-6 (ICC = 0.93 - 0.94), ankle lunge test (ICC = 0.85-0.95), Beighton scale (ICC = 0.96-0.98) and LLAS (ICC = 0.90-0.98). Inter-rater reliability was largely good for each of the: FPI-6 (ICC = 0.79), ankle lunge test (ICC = 0.83), Beighton scale (ICC = 0.73) and LLAS (ICC = 0.78).
Conclusion:
The four measures investigated demonstrated adequate intra-rater and inter-rater reliability in this paediatric sample, which further justifies their use in clinical practice.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/5/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Angela Evans</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Keith Rome</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lauren Peet</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2012, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-5-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-5-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/5/1/2">
        <title>Foot health education for people with rheumatoid arthritis: the practitioner&apos;s perspective</title>
        <description>Background:
Patient education is considered to be a key role for podiatrists in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patient education has undoubtedly led to improved clinical outcomes, however no attempts have been made to optimise its content or delivery to maximise benefits within the context of the foot affected by rheumatoid arthritis. The aim of this study was to identify the nature and content of podiatrists&apos; foot health education for people with RA. Any potential barriers to its provision were also explored.
Methods:
A focus group was conducted. The audio dialogue was recorded digitally, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a structured, thematic approach. The full transcription was verified by the focus group as an accurate account of what was said. The thematic analysis framework was verified by members of the research team to ensure validity of the data.
Results:
Twelve members (all female) of the north west Podiatry Clinical Effectiveness Group for Rheumatology participated. Six overarching themes emerged: (i) the essence of patient education; (ii) the content; (iii)  patient-centred approach to content and timing; (iv) barriers to provision; (v)  the therapeutic relationship; and (vi) tools of the trade.
Conclusion:
The study identified aspects of patient education that this group of podiatrists consider most important in relation to its: content, timing, delivery and barriers to its provision. General disease and foot health information in relation to RA together with a potential prognosis for foot health, the role of the podiatrist in management of foot health, and appropriate self-management strategies were considered to be key aspects of content, delivered according to the needs of the individual. Barriers to foot health education provision, including financial constraints and difficulties in establishing effective therapeutic relationships, were viewed as factors that strongly influenced foot health education provision.  These data will contribute to the development of a patient-centred, negotiated approach to the provision of foot health education for people with RA.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/5/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Andrea Graham</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alison Hammond</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anita Williams</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2012, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-5-2</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>A focus group study of podiatrists identifies factors that influence the delivery of patient education to people with rheumatoid arthritis and provides insights into potential barriers to adherence.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-5-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/1/11">
        <title>Acral lentiginous melanoma of the foot and ankle: A case series and review of the literature</title>
        <description>Background:
Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is an uncommon, cutaneous malignant tumour which may arise on the foot. Its relative rarity, atypical appearance and late presentation frequently serve as poor prognostic indicators.
Methods:
At a tertiary skin tumour centre, a retrospective review was undertaken of all patients diagnosed with the tumour at the level of ankle or below.
Results:
Over a six year period, 27 cases (20 female, 7 male) were identified with positive histology confirming the disease. The age ranged from 35&#8211;96 years of age (mean 62.7 years). The majority of the cohort were white (59%) with plantar lesions (62%). 33% of patients were initially were diagnosed incorrectly. The average time taken from the point of recognition, by the patient, to the lesion being correctly diagnosed was around 13.5 months.
Conclusion:
Earlier diagnosis of ALM requires education at both a patient and practitioner level.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Ivan Bristow</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katharine Acland</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2008, null:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-09-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-1-11</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-1-11-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-09-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/1/7">
        <title>Plantar calcaneal spurs in older people: longitudinal traction or vertical compression?</title>
        <description>Background:
Plantar calcaneal spurs are common, however their pathophysiology is poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and correlates of plantar calcaneal spurs in a large sample of older people.
Methods:
Weightbearing lateral foot radiographs of 216 people (140 women and 76 men) aged 62 to 94 years (mean age 75.9, SD 6.6) were examined for plantar calcaneal and Achilles tendon spurs. Associations between the presence of spurs and sex, body mass index, radiographic measures of foot posture, self-reported co-morbidities and current or previous heel pain were then explored.
Results:
Of the 216 participants, 119 (55%) had at least one plantar calcaneal spur and 103 (48%) had at least one Achilles tendon spur. Those with plantar calcaneal spurs were more likely to have Achilles tendon spurs (odds ratio [OR] = 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 3.5). Prevalence of spurs did not differ according to sex. Participants with plantar calcaneal spurs were more likely to be obese (OR = 7.9, 95% CI 3.6 to 17.0), report osteoarthritis (OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.6 to 4.8) and have current or previous heel pain (OR = 4.6, 95% CI 2.3 to 9.4). No relationship was found between the presence of calcaneal spurs and radiographic measures of foot posture.
Conclusion:
Calcaneal spurs are common in older men and women and are related to obesity, osteoarthritis and current or previous heel pain, but are unrelated to radiographic measurements of foot posture. These findings support the theory that plantar calcaneal spurs may be an adaptive response to vertical compression of the heel rather than longitudinal traction at the calcaneal enthesis.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Hylton Menz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gerard Zammit</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karl Landorf</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shannon Munteanu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2008, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-08-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-1-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-1-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/4/1/19">
        <title>The effectiveness of manual stretching in the treatment of plantar heel pain: a systematic review</title>
        <description>Background:
Plantar heel pain is a commonly occurring foot complaint. Stretching is frequently utilised as a treatment, yet a systematic review focusing only on its effectiveness has not been published. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of stretching on pain and function in people with plantar heel pain.
Methods:
Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, and The Cochrane Library were searched from inception to July 2010. Studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria were independently assessed, and their quality evaluated using the modified PEDro scale.
Results:
Six studies including 365 symptomatic participants were included. Two compared stretching with a control, one study compared stretching to an alternative intervention, one study compared stretching to both alternative and control interventions, and two compared different stretching techniques and durations. Quality rating on the modified Pedro scale varied from two to eight out of a maximum of ten points. The methodologies and interventions varied significantly between studies, making meta-analysis inappropriate. Most participants improved over the course of the studies, but when stretching was compared to alternative or control interventions, the changes only reached statistical significance in one study that used a combination of calf muscle stretches and plantar fascia stretches in their stretching programme. Another study comparing different stretching techniques, showed a statistically significant reduction in some aspects of pain in favour of plantar fascia stretching over calf stretches in the short term.
Conclusions:
There were too few studies to assess whether stretching is effective compared to control or other interventions, for either pain or function. However, there is some evidence that plantar fascia stretching may be more effective than Achilles tendon stretching alone in the short-term. Appropriately powered randomised controlled trials, utilizing validated outcome measures, blinded assessors and long-term follow up are needed to assess the efficacy of stretching.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/4/1/19</link>
                <dc:creator>David Sweeting</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ben Parish</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lee Hooper</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rachel Chester</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2011, null:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-06-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-4-19</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Is stretching effective for plantar heel pain?</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>A systematic review of 6 trials involving 365 participants concludes that although there are too few studies to assess whether stretching is effective compared to control or other interventions, there is some evidence that plantar fascia stretching may be more effective than Achilles tendon stretching alone.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-4-19-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-06-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/16">
        <title>Idiopathic toe walking and sensory processing dysfunction</title>
        <description>Background:
It is generally understood that toe walking involves the absence or limitation of heel strike in the contact phase of the gait cycle. Toe walking has been identified as a symptom of disease processes, trauma and/or neurogenic influences. When there is no obvious cause of the gait pattern, a diagnosis of idiopathic toe walking (ITW) is made. Although there has been limited research into the pathophysiology of ITW, there has been an increasing number of contemporary texts and practitioner debates proposing that this gait pattern is linked to a sensory processing dysfunction (SPD). The purpose of this paper is to examine the literature and provide a summary of what is known about the relationship between toe walking and SPD.MethodForty-nine articles were reviewed, predominantly sourced from peer reviewed journals. Five contemporary texts were also reviewed. The literature styles consisted of author opinion pieces, letters to the editor, clinical trials, case studies, classification studies, poster/conference abstracts and narrative literature reviews. Literature was assessed and graded according to level of evidence.
Results:
Only one small prospective, descriptive study without control has been conducted in relation to idiopathic toe walking and sensory processing. A cross-sectional study into the prevalence of idiopathic toe walking proposed sensory processing as being a reason for the difference. A proposed link between ITW and sensory processing was found within four contemporary texts and one conference abstract.
Conclusion:
Based on the limited conclusive evidence available, the relationship between ITW and sensory processing has not been confirmed. Given the limited number and types of studies together with the growing body of anecdotal evidence it is proposed that further investigation of this relationship would be advantageous.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Cylie Williams</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paul Tinley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Curtin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, null:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-16</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-3-16-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/4/1/25">
        <title>Forefoot pathology in rheumatoid arthritis identified with ultrasound may not localise to areas of highest pressure: cohort observations at baseline and twelve months</title>
        <description>Background:
Plantar pressures are commonly used as clinical measures, especially to determine optimum foot orthotic design. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) high plantar foot pressures have been linked to metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint radiological erosion scores. However, the sensitivity of foot pressure measurement to soft tissue pathology within the foot is unknown. The aim of this study was to observe plantar foot pressures and forefoot soft tissue pathology in patients who have RA.
Methods:
A total of 114 patients with established RA (1987 ACR criteria) and 50 healthy volunteers were assessed at baseline. All RA participants returned for reassessment at twelve months. Interface foot-shoe plantar pressures were recorded using an F-Scan&#174; system. The presence of forefoot soft tissue pathology was assessed using a DIASUS musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) system. Chi-square analyses and independent t-tests were used to determine statistical differences between baseline and twelve months. Pearson&apos;s correlation coefficient was used to determine interrelationships between soft tissue pathology and foot pressures.
Results:
At baseline, RA patients had a significantly higher peak foot pressures compared to healthy participants and peak pressures were located in the medial aspect of the forefoot in both groups. In contrast, RA participants had US detectable soft tissue pathology in the lateral aspect of the forefoot. Analysis of person specific data suggests that there are considerable variations over time with more than half the RA cohort having unstable presence of US detectable forefoot soft tissue pathology. Findings also indicated that, over time, changes in US detectable soft tissue pathology are out of phase with changes in foot-shoe interface pressures both temporally and spatially.
Conclusions:
We found that US detectable forefoot soft tissue pathology may be unrelated to peak forefoot pressures and suggest that patients with RA may biomechanically adapt to soft tissue forefoot pathology. In addition, we have observed that, in patients with RA, interface foot-shoe pressures and the presence of US detectable forefoot pathology may vary substantially over time. This has implications for clinical strategies that aim to offload peak plantar pressures.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/4/1/25</link>
                <dc:creator>Catherine Bowen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Culliford</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ruth Allen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Beacroft</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anita Gay</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lindsey Hooper</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jane Burridge</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Edwards</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nigel Arden</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2011, null:25</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-11-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-4-25</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-4-25-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/4/1/26">
        <title>Safety and efficacy of tinea pedis and onychomycosis treatment in people with diabetes: a systematic review</title>
        <description>Background:
Effective treatment of tinea pedis and onychomycosis is crucial for patients with diabetes as these infections may lead to foot ulcers and secondary bacterial infections resulting in eventual lower limb amputation. Although numerous studies have assessed the effectiveness of antifungal drug and treatment regimens, most exclude patients with diabetes and examine otherwise healthy individuals. While these studies are useful, results cannot necessarily be extrapolated to patients with diabetes. The purpose of this study was to therefore identify the best evidence-based treatment interventions for tinea pedis or onychomycosis in people with diabetes.
Methods:
The question for this systemic review was: &apos;what evidence is there for the safety and/or efficacy of all treatment interventions for adults with tinea pedis and/or onychomycosis in people with diabetes&apos;? A systematic literature search of four electronic databases (Scopus, EbscoHost, Ovid, Web of Science) was undertaken (6/1/11). The primary outcome measure for safety was self-reported adverse events likely to be drug-related, while the primary outcome measures assessed for &apos;efficacy&apos; were mycological, clinical and complete cure.
Results:
The systematic review identified six studies that examined the safety and/or efficacy of treatment interventions for onychomycosis in people with diabetes. No studies were identified that examined treatment for tinea pedis. Of the studies identified, two were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and four were case series. Based on the best available evidence identified, it can be suggested that oral terbinafine is as safe and effective as oral itraconazole therapy for the treatment of onychomycosis in people with diabetes. However, efficacy results were found to be poor.
Conclusions:
This review indicates that there is good evidence (Level II) to suggest oral terbinafine is as safe and effective as itraconazole therapy for the treatment of onychomycosis in people with diabetes. Further research is needed to establish the evidence for other treatment modalities and treatment for tinea pedis for people with diabetes. Future efforts are needed to improve the efficacy of treatment intervention.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/4/1/26</link>
                <dc:creator>Lisa Matricciani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kerwin Talbot</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sara Jones</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2011, null:26</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-12-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-4-26</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-4-26-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>26</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-12-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/1/6">
        <title>Normative values for the Foot Posture Index</title>
        <description>Background:
The Foot Posture Index (FPI) is a validated method for quantifying standing foot posture, and is being used in a variety of clinical settings. There have however, been no normative data available to date for comparison and reference. This study aimed to establish normative FPI reference values.
Methods:
Studies reporting FPI data were identified by searching online databases. Nine authors contributed anonymised versions of their original datasets comprising 1648 individual observations. The datasets included information relating to centre, age, gender, pathology (if relevant), FPI scores and body mass index (BMI) where available. FPI total scores were transformed to interval logit scores as per the Rasch model and normal ranges were defined. Comparisons between groups employed t-tests or ANOVA models as appropriate and data were explored descriptively and graphically.
Results:
The main analysis based on a normal healthy population (n = 619) confirmed that a slightly pronated foot posture is the normal position at rest (mean back transformed FPI raw score = +4). A &apos;U&apos; shaped relationship existed for age, with minors and older adults exhibiting significantly higher FPI scores than the general adult population (F = 51.07, p &lt; 0.001). There was no difference between the FPI scores of males and females (2.3 versus 2.5; t = -1.44, p = 0.149). No relationship was found between the FPI and BMI. Systematic differences from the adult normals were confirmed in patients with neurogenic and idiopathic cavus (F = 216.981, p &lt; 0.001), indicating some sensitivity of the instrument to detect a posturally pathological population.
Conclusion:
A set of population norms for children, adults and older people have been derived from a large sample. Foot posture is related to age and the presence of pathology, but not influenced by gender or BMI. The normative values identified may assist in classifying foot type for the purpose of research and clinical decision making.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/1/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Anthony Redmond</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yvonne Crane</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hylton Menz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2008, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-07-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-1-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-1-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-07-31T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/22">
        <title>A protocol for classifying normal- and flat-arched foot posture for research studies using clinical and radiographic measurements</title>
        <description>Background:
There are several clinical and radiological methods available to classify foot posture in research, however there is no clear strategy for selecting the most appropriate measurements. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a foot screening protocol to distinguish between participants with normal- and flat-arched feet who would then subsequently be recruited into a series of laboratory-based gait studies.
Methods:
The foot posture of ninety-one asymptomatic young adults was assessed using two clinical measurements (normalised navicular height and arch index) and four radiological measurements taken from antero-posterior and lateral x-rays (talus-second metatarsal angle, talo-navicular coverage angle, calcaneal inclination angle and calcaneal-first metatarsal angle). Normative foot posture values were taken from the literature and used to recruit participants with normal-arched feet. Data from these participants were subsequently used to define the boundary between normal- and flat-arched feet. This information was then used to recruit participants with flat-arched feet. The relationship between the clinical and radiographic measures of foot posture was also explored.
Results:
Thirty-two participants were recruited to the normal-arched study, 31 qualified for the flat-arched study and 28 participants were classified as having neither normal- or flat-arched feet and were not suitable for either study. The values obtained from the two clinical and four radiological measurements established two clearly defined foot posture groups. Correlations among clinical and radiological measures were significant (p &lt; 0.05) and ranged from r = 0.24 to 0.70. Interestingly, the clinical measures were more strongly associated with the radiographic angles obtained from the lateral view.
Conclusion:
This foot screening protocol provides a coherent strategy for researchers planning to recruit participants with normal- and flat-arched feet. However, further research is required to determine whether foot posture variations in the sagittal, transverse or both planes provide the best descriptor of the flat foot.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/22</link>
                <dc:creator>George Murley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hylton Menz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karl Landorf</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2009, null:22</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-2-22</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1757-1146-2-22-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

