<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</description>
        <dc:date>2010-03-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/37" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/36" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/35" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/34" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/33" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/32" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/4">
        <title>The International Documentation and Evaluation System IDES: a single center observational case series for development of an ankle prosthesis documentation questionnaire and study of its feasibility and face validity</title>
        <description>Background:
The number of implanted total ankle replacements is increasing and most articles present short- and mid-term results. Comparison of outcomes is difficult because of inconsistent terminology and different use of parameters.Materials and Methods: we created a module for total ankle prostheses in the framework of the International Documentation and Evaluation System (IDES). Content development was conducted with an iterative process based on a single surgeon series of 74 HINTEGRA(c) total ankle replacements and expert opinions.
Results:
the IDES ankle module comprises three forms A, B and C for recording of primary (A), revision (B) and followup (C) procedures. 74 primary interventions, 28 revisions and 92 followups could be documented in detail with the final version of the questionnaires.
Conclusion:
The IDES-forms facilitate a structured and standardized data collection for total ankle arthroplasties. Implemented on the academic MEMdoc portal (www.memdoc.org) of the University of Bern, all registered users can make use of IDES in its online or paper based versions.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Peter Diel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christoph Thier</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Emin Aghayev</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Markus Preis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marcel Dudda</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Norman Espinosa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christoph Roder</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-03-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-03-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/3">
        <title>Heel raises versus prefabricated orthoses in the treatment of posterior heel pain associated with calcaneal apophysitis (Sever&apos;s disease): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial</title>
        <description>Background:
Posterior Heel pain can present in children of 8 to 14 years, associated with or clinically diagnosed as Sever&apos;s disease, or calcaneal apophysitis. Presently, there are no comparative randomised studies evaluating treatment options for posterior heel pain in children with the clinical diagnosis of calcaneal apophysitis or Sever&apos;s disease. This study seeks to compare the clinical efficacy of some currently employed treatment options for the relief of disability and pain associated with posterior heel pain in children.MethodDesign: Factorial 2 &#215; 2 randomised controlled trial with monthly follow-up for 3 months.Participants: Children with clinically diagnosed posterior heel pain possibly associated with calcaneal apophysitis/Sever&apos;s disease (n = 124).Interventions: Treatment factor 1 will be two types of shoe orthoses: a heel raise or prefabricated orthoses. Both of these interventions are widely available, mutually exclusive treatment approaches that are relatively low in cost. Treatment factor 2 will be a footwear prescription/replacement intervention involving a shoe with a firm heel counter, dual density EVA midsole and rear foot control. The alternate condition in this factor is no footwear prescription/replacement, with the participant wearing their current footwear.Outcomes: Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire and the Faces pain scale.DiscussionThis will be a randomised trial to compare the efficacy of various treatment options for posterior heel pain in children that may be associated with calcaneal apophysitis also known as Sever&apos;s disease.Trial RegistrationTrial Number: ACTRN12609000696291Ethics Approval Southern Health: HREC Ref: 09271B</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Alicia James</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cylie Williams</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Terry Haines</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-03-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-03-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/2">
        <title>Combined rotation scarf and Akin osteotomies for hallux valgus: a patient focussed 9 year follow up of 50 patients

</title>
        <description>Background:
The Cochrane review of hallux valgus surgery has disputed the scientific validity of hallux valgus research. Scoring systems and surrogate measures such as x-ray angles are commonly reported at just one year post operatively but these are of dubious relevance to the patient. In this study we extended the follow up to a minimum of 8 years and sought to address patient specific concerns with hallux valgus surgery. The long term follow up also allowed a comprehensive review of the complications associated with the combined rotation scarf and Akin osteotomies.
Methods:
Between 1996 and 1999, 101 patients underwent rotation scarf and Akin osteotomies for the treatment of hallux valgus. All patients were contacted and asked to participate in this study. 50 female participants were available allowing review of 73 procedures. The average follow up was over 9 years and the average age at the time of surgery was 57. The participants were physically examined and interviewed.
Results:
Post-operatively, in 86% of the participants there were no footwear restrictions. Stiffness of the first metatarsophalangeal joint was reported in 8% (6 feet); 10% were unhappy with the cosmetic appearance of their feet, 3 feet had hallux varus, and 2 feet had recurrent hallux valgus. There were no foot-related activity restrictions in 92% of the group. Metatarsalgia occurred in 4% (3 feet). 96% were better than before surgery and 88% were completely satisfied with their post-operative result. Hallux varus was the greatest single cause of dissatisfaction. The most common adverse event in the study was internal fixation irritation. Hallux valgus surgery is not without risk and these findings could be useful in the informed consent process.
Conclusions:
When combined the rotation scarf and Akin osteotomies are an effective treatment for hallux valgus that achieves good long-term correction with a low incidence of recurrence, footwear restriction or metatarsalgia. The nature of the osteotomies allows early return to normal shoes and activity without the need for postoperative immobilisation in a plaster cast.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Tim Kilmartin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claire O'Kane</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/1">
        <title>Non-medical prescribing in Australasia and the UK: the case of podiatry</title>
        <description>Background:
The last decade has witnessed a rapid transformation in the role boundaries of the allied health professions, enabled through the creation of new roles and the expansion of existing, traditional roles. A strategy of health care &apos;modernisation&apos; has encompassed calls for the redrawing of professional boundaries and identities, linked with demands for greater workforce flexibility. Several tasks and roles previously within the exclusive domain of medicine have been delegated to, or assumed by, allied health professionals, as the workforce is reshaped to meet the challenges posed by changing demographic, social and political contexts. The prescribing of medicines by non-medically qualified healthcare professionals, and in particular the podiatry profession, reflects these changes.
Methods:
Using a range of key primary documentary sources derived from published material in the public domain and unpublished material in private possession, this paper traces the development of contemporary UK and Australasian podiatric prescribing, access, supply and administration of medicines. Documentary sources include material from legislative, health policy, regulatory and professional bodies (including both State and Federal sources in Australia).
Results:
Tracing a chronological, comparative, socio-historical account of the emergence and development of &apos;prescribing&apos; in podiatry in both Australasia and the UK enables an analysis of the impact of health policy reforms on the use of, and access to, medicines by podiatrists. The advent of neo-liberal healthcare policies, coupled with demands for workforce flexibility and role transfer within a climate of demographic, economic and social change has enabled allied health professionals to undertake an expanding number of tasks involving the sale, supply, administration and prescription of medicines.
Conclusion:
As a challenge to medical dominance, these changes, although driven by wider healthcare policy, have met with resistance. As anticipated in the theory of medical dominance, inter-professional jurisdictional disputes centred on the right to access, administer, supply and prescribe medicines act as obstacles to workforce change. Nevertheless, the broader policy agenda continues to ensure workforce redesign in which podiatry has assumed wider roles and responsibilities in prescribing.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Alan Borthwick</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anthony Short</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Nancarrow</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rosalie Boyce</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/37">
        <title>Recent developments in podiatric prescribing in the UK and Australia 




</title>
        <description>Recent and substantial changes in access to restricted medicines by podiatrists in Australia are clearly consistent with healthcare policies aimed at reshaping the healthcare workforce. At the same time, prescribing and access to medicines by allied health professionals, including podiatrists, has been the focus of a recent scoping project by the UK Department of Health. In this commentary we explore the possible implications of these changes.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/37</link>
                <dc:creator>Mark Gilheany</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alan Borthwick</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2009, 2:37</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-2-37</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>37</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/36">
        <title>Footing the bill: the introduction of Medicare Benefits Schedule rebates for podiatry services in Australia</title>
        <description>The introduction of Medicare Benefits Schedule items for allied health professionals in 2004 was a pivotal event in the public funding of non-medical primary care services. This commentary seeks to provide supplementary discussion of the article by Menz (Utilisation of podiatry services in Australia under the Medicare Enhanced Primary Care program, 2004-2008 Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2009, 2:30), by placing these findings within the context of the podiatry profession, clinical decision making and the broader health workforce and government policy.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/36</link>
                <dc:creator>Anthony Short</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2009, 2:36</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-2-36</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>36</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/35">
        <title>Foot posture influences the electromyographic activity of selected lower limb muscles during gait</title>
        <description>Background:
Some studies have found that flat-arched foot posture is related to altered lower limb muscle function compared to normal- or high-arched feet. However, the results from these studies were based on highly selected populations such as those with rheumatoid arthritis. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare lower limb muscle function of normal and flat-arched feet in people without pain or disease.
Methods:
Sixty adults aged 18 to 47 years were recruited to this study. Of these, 30 had normal-arched feet (15 male and 15 female) and 30 had flat-arched feet (15 male and 15 female). Foot posture was classified using two clinical measurements (the arch index and navicular height) and four skeletal alignment measurements from weightbearing foot x-rays. Intramuscular fine-wire electrodes were inserted into tibialis posterior and peroneus longus under ultrasound guidance, and surface EMG activity was recorded from tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius while participants walked barefoot at their self-selected comfortable walking speed. Time of peak amplitude, peak and root mean square (RMS) amplitude were assessed from stance phase EMG data. Independent samples t-tests were performed to assess for significant differences between the normal- and flat-arched foot posture groups.
Results:
During contact phase, the flat-arched group exhibited increased activity of tibialis anterior (peak amplitude; 65 versus 46% of maximum voluntary isometric contraction) and decreased activity of peroneus longus (peak amplitude; 24 versus 37% of maximum voluntary isometric contraction). During midstance/propulsion, the flat-arched group exhibited increased activity of tibialis posterior (peak amplitude; 86 versus 60% of maximum voluntary isometric contraction) and decreased activity of peroneus longus (RMS amplitude; 25 versus 39% of maximum voluntary isometric contraction). Effect sizes for these significant findings ranged from 0.48 to 1.3, representing moderate to large differences in muscle activity between normal-arched and flat-arched feet.
Conclusion:
Differences in muscle activity in people with flat-arched feet may reflect neuromuscular compensation to reduce overload of the medial longitudinal arch. Further research is required to determine whether these differences in muscle function are associated with injury.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/35</link>
                <dc:creator>George Murley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hylton Menz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karl Landorf</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2009, 2:35</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-2-35</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>35</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/34">
        <title>A questionnaire for determining prevalence of diabetes related foot disease (Q-DFD): construction and validation</title>
        <description>Background:
Community based prevalence for diabetes related foot disease (DRFD) has been poorly quantified in Australian populations. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a survey tool to facilitate collection of community based prevalence data for individuals with DRFD via telephone interview.
Methods:
Agreed components of DRFD were identified through an electronic literature search. Expert feedback and feedback from a population based construction sample were sought on the initial draft. Survey reliability was tested using a cohort recruited through a general practice, a hospital outpatient clinic and an outpatient podiatry clinic. Level of agreement between survey findings and either medical record or clinical assessment was evaluated.
Results:
The Questionnaire for Diabetes Related Foot Disease (Q-DFD) comprised 12 questions aimed at determining presence of peripheral sensory neuropathy (PN) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD), based on self report of symptoms and/or clinical history, and self report of foot ulceration, amputation and foot deformity. Survey results for 38 from 46 participants demonstrated agreement with either clinical assessment or medical record (kappa 0.65, sensitivity 89.0%, and specificity 77.8%). Correlation for individual survey components was moderate to excellent. Inter and intrarater reliability and test re-test reliability was moderate to high for all survey domains.
Conclusion:
The development of the Q-DFD provides an opportunity for ongoing collection of prevalence estimates for DRFD across Australia.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/34</link>
                <dc:creator>Shan Bergin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Caroline Brand</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Colman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Donald Campbell</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2009, 2:34</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-2-34</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>34</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/33">
        <title>Reliability of measuring abductor hallucis muscle parameters using two different diagnostic ultrasound machines </title>
        <description>Background:
Diagnostic ultrasound provides a method of analysing soft tissue structures of the musculoskeletal system effectively and reliably. The aim of this study was to evaluate within and between session reliability of measuring muscle dorso-plantar thickness, medio-lateral length and cross-sectional area, of the abductor hallucis muscle using two different ultrasound machines, a higher end Philips HD11 Ultrasound machine and clinically orientated Chison 8300 Deluxe Digital Portable Ultrasound System.
Methods:
The abductor hallucis muscle of both the left and right feet of thirty asymptomatic participants was imaged and then measured using both ultrasound machines. Interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to calculate both within and between session intra-tester reliability. Standard error of the measurement (SEM) calculations were undertaken to assess difference between the actual measured score across trials and the smallest real difference (SRD) was calculated from the SEM to indicate the degree of change that would exceed the expected trial to trial variability.
Results:
The ICCs, SEM and SRD for dorso-plantar thickness and medial-lateral length were shown to have excellent to high within and between-session reliability for both ultrasound machines. The between-session reliability indices for cross-sectional area were acceptable for both ultrasound machines.
Conclusion:
The results of the current study suggest that regardless of the type ultrasound machine, intra-tester reliability for the measurement the abductor hallucis muscle parameters is very high.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/33</link>
                <dc:creator>Wayne Hing</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Keith Rome</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aylse Cameron</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2009, 2:33</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-2-33</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/32">
        <title>Diagnostic imaging for chronic plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title>
        <description>Background:
Chronic plantar heel pain (CPHP) is a generalised term used to describe a range of undifferentiated conditions affecting the plantar heel. Plantar fasciitis is reported as the most common cause and the terms are frequently used interchangeably in the literature. Diagnostic imaging has been used by many researchers and practitioners to investigate the involvement of specific anatomical structures in CPHP. These observations help to explain the underlying pathology of the disorder, and are of benefit in forming an accurate diagnosis and targeted treatment plan. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the diagnostic imaging features associated with CPHP, and evaluate study findings by meta-analysis where appropriate.
Methods:
Bibliographic databases including Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SportDiscus and The Cochrane Library were searched electronically on March 25, 2009. Eligible articles were required to report imaging findings in participants with CPHP unrelated to inflammatory arthritis, and to compare these findings with a control group. Methodological quality was evaluated by use of the Quality Index as described by Downs and Black. Meta-analysis of study data was conducted where appropriate.
Results:
Plantar fascia thickness as measured by ultrasonography was the most widely reported imaging feature. Meta-analysis revealed that the plantar fascia of CPHP participants was 2.16 mm thicker than control participants (95% CI = 1.60 to 2.71 mm, P &lt; 0.001) and that CPHP participants were more likely to have plantar fascia thickness values greater than 4.0 mm (OR = 105.11, 95% CI = 3.09 to 3577.28, P = 0.01). CPHP participants were also more likely to show radiographic evidence of subcalcaneal spur than control participants (OR = 8.52, 95% CI = 4.08 to 17.77, P &lt; 0.001).
Conclusion:
This systematic review has identified 23 studies investigating the diagnostic imaging appearance of the plantar fascia and inferior calcaneum in people with CPHP. Analysis of these studies found that people with CPHP are likely to have a thickened plantar fascia with associated fluid collection, and that thickness values &gt;4.0 mm are diagnostic of plantar fasciitis. Additionally, subcalcaneal spur formation is strongly associated with pain beneath the heel.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/2/1/32</link>
                <dc:creator>Andrew McMillan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karl Landorf</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joanna Barrett</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hylton Menz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adam Bird</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2009, 2:32</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-2-32</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>32</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
