<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</description>
        <dc:date>2010-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/12" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/9" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/18">
        <title>Effectiveness of dry needling and injections of myofascial trigger points associated with plantar heel pain: a systematic review</title>
        <description>Background:
Plantar heel pain (plantar fasciitis) is one of the most common musculoskeletal pathologies of the foot. Plantar heel pain can be managed with dry needling and/or injection of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) however the evidence for its effectiveness is uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the current evidence for the effectiveness of dry needling and/or injections of MTrPs associated with plantar heel pain.
Methods:
We searched specific electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and AMI) in April 2010 to identify randomised and non-randomised trials. We included trials where participants diagnosed with plantar heel pain were treated with dry needling and/or injections (local anaesthetics, steroids, Botulinum toxin A and saline) alone or in combination with acupuncture. Outcome measures that focussed on pain and function were extracted from the data. Trials were assessed for quality using the Quality Index tool.
Results:
Three quasi-experimental trials matched the inclusion criteria: two trials found a reduction in pain for the use of trigger point dry needling when combined with acupuncture and the third found a reduction in pain using 1% lidocaine injections when combined with physical therapy. However, the methodological quality of the three trials was poor, with Quality Index scores ranging form 7 to 12 out of a possible score of 27. A meta-analysis was not conducted because substantial heterogeneity was present between trials.
Conclusions:
There is limited evidence for the effectiveness of dry needling and/or injections of MTrPs associated with plantar heel pain. However, the poor quality and heterogeneous nature of the included studies precludes definitive conclusions being made. Importantly, this review highlights the need for future trials to use rigorous randomised controlled methodology with measures such as blinding to reduce bias. We also recommend that such trials adhere to the Standards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA) to ensure transparency.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Matthew Cotchett</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karl Landorf</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shannon Munteanu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-18</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-09-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/17">
        <title>A case-series study to explore the efficacy of foot orthoses in treating first metatarsophalangeal joint pain </title>
        <description>Background:
First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint pain is a common foot complaint which is often considered to be a consequence of altered mechanics.  Foot orthoses are often prescribed to reduce 1st MTP joint pain with the aim of altering dorsiflexion at propulsion. This study explores changes in 1st MTP joint pain and kinematics following the use of foot orthoses.
Methods:
The effect of modified, pre-fabricated foot orthoses (X-line) were evaluated in thirty-two patients with 1st MTP joint pain of mechanical origin. The primary outcome was pain measured at baseline and 24 weeks using the pain subscale of the foot function index (FFI). In a small sub-group of patients (n = 9), the relationship between pain and kinematic variables was explored with and without their orthoses, using an electromagnetic motion tracking (EMT) system.
Results:
A significant reduction in pain was observed between baseline (median = 48mm) and the 24 week endpoint (median = 14.50mm, z = -4.88, p &lt; 0.001). In the sub-group analysis, we found no relationship between pain reduction and 1st MTP joint motion, and no significant differences were found between the 1st MTP joint maximum dorsiflexion or ankle/subtalar complex maximum eversion, with and without the orthoses.
Conclusions:
This observational study demonstrated a significant decrease in 1st MTP joint pain associated with the use of foot orthoses. Change in pain was not shown to be associated with 1st MTP joint dorsiflexion nor with altered ankle/subtalar complex eversion. Further research into the effect of foot orthoses on foot function is indicated.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/17</link>
                <dc:creator>Brian Welsh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anthony Redmond</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nachiappan Chockalingam</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anne-Maree Keenan</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-17</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/16">
        <title>Idiopathic toe walking and sensory processing dysfunction</title>
        <description>Background:
It is generally understood that toe walking involves the absence or limitation of heel strike in the contact phase of the gait cycle. Toe walking has been identified as a symptom of disease processes, trauma and/or neurogenic influences. When there is no obvious cause of the gait pattern, a diagnosis of idiopathic toe walking (ITW) is made. Although there has been limited research into the pathophysiology of ITW, there has been an increasing number of contemporary texts and practitioner debates proposing that this gait pattern is linked to a sensory processing dysfunction (SPD). The purpose of this paper is to examine the literature and provide a summary of what is known about the relationship between toe walking and SPD.MethodForty-nine articles were reviewed, predominantly sourced from peer reviewed journals. Five contemporary texts were also reviewed. The literature styles consisted of author opinion pieces, letters to the editor, clinical trials, case studies, classification studies, poster/conference abstracts and narrative literature reviews. Literature was assessed and graded according to level of evidence.
Results:
Only one small prospective, descriptive study without control has been conducted in relation to idiopathic toe walking and sensory processing. A cross-sectional study into the prevalence of idiopathic toe walking proposed sensory processing as being a reason for the difference. A proposed link between ITW and sensory processing was found within four contemporary texts and one conference abstract.
Conclusion:
Based on the limited conclusive evidence available, the relationship between ITW and sensory processing has not been confirmed. Given the limited number and types of studies together with the growing body of anecdotal evidence it is proposed that further investigation of this relationship would be advantageous.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Cylie Williams</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paul Tinley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Curtin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-16</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/15">
        <title>Ultrasound guided injection of dexamethasone versus placebo for treatment of plantar fasciitis: protocol for a randomised controlled trial</title>
        <description>Background:
Plantar fasciitis is the most commonly reported cause of chronic pain beneath the heel. Management of this condition commonly involves the use of corticosteroid injection in cases where less invasive treatments have failed. However, despite widespread use, only two randomised trials have tested the effect of this treatment in comparison to placebo. These trials currently offer the best available evidence by which to guide clinical practice, though both were limited by methodological issues such as insufficient statistical power. Therefore, the aim of this randomised trial is to compare the effect of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection versus placebo for treatment of plantar fasciitis.
Methods:
The trial will be conducted at the La Trobe University Podiatry Clinic and will recruit 80 community-dwelling participants. Diagnostic ultrasound will be used to diagnose plantar fasciitis and participants will be required to meet a range of selection criteria. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two treatment arms: (i) ultrasound-guided injection of the plantar fascia with 1 mL of 4 mg/mL dexamethasone sodium phosphate (experimental group), or (ii) ultrasound-guided injection of the plantar fascia with 1 mL normal saline (control group). Blinding will be applied to participants and the investigator performing procedures, measuring outcomes and analysing data. Primary outcomes will be pain measured by the Foot Health Status Questionnaire and plantar fascia thickness measured by ultrasound at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. All data analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis.
Conclusion:
This will be a randomised trial investigating the effect of dexamethasone injection on pre-specified treatment outcomes in people with plantar fasciitis. Within the parameters of this protocol, the trial findings will be used to make evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of corticosteroid injection for treatment of this condition.Trial RegistrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. ACTRN12610000239066.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Andrew McMillan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karl Landorf</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Gilheany</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adam Bird</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adam Morrow</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hylton Menz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-07-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-15</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-07-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/14">
        <title>A comparison of foot arch measurement reliability using both digital photography and calliper methods</title>
        <description>Background:
Both calliper devices and digital photographic methods have been used to quantify foot arch height parameters. The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability of both a calliper device and digital photographic method in determining the arch height index (AHI).
Methods:
Twenty subjects underwent measurements of AHI on two separate days. On each day, AHI measurements during both sitting and standing were taken using the AHIMS and digital photographic methods by the same single tester. The intra-tester reliability of each measurement technique was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM). Additionally, the relationship between AHI measurements derived from the two different methods was assessed using a correlation analysis.
Results:
The reliability for both the AHIMS and digital photographic methods was excellent with ICC values exceeding 0.86 and SEM values of less than 0.009 for the AHI. Moreover, the reliability of both measurement techniques was equivalent. There was a strong positive correlation between the AHI values collected using both methods. AHI values calculated using the digital photographic method tended to be greater than those derived using the AHIMS.
Conclusion:
Digital photographic methods offer equivalent intra-tester reliability to previously established calliper methods when assessing AHI. While AHI measurements calculated using both methods were highly related, the greater AHI values in the photographic method implied caution should be exercised when comparing absolute values between the two methods. Future studies are required to determine whether digital photographic methods can be developed with improved validity.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Michael Pohl</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lindsay Farr</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-07-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-14</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-07-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/13">
        <title>The instantaneous helical axis of the subtalar and talocrural joints: a non-invasive in vivo dynamic study</title>
        <description>Background:
An understanding of rear-foot (talocrural and subtalar joints) kinematics is critical for diagnosing foot pathologies, designing total ankle implants, treating rear-foot injuries and quantifying gait abnormalities. The majority of kinematic data available have been acquired through static cadaver work or passive in vivo studies. The applicability of these data to dynamic in vivo situations remains unknown. Thus, the purpose of this study was to fully quantify subtalar, talocrural and calcaneal-tibial in vivo kinematics in terms of the instantaneous helical axis (IHA) in twenty-five healthy ankles during a volitional activity that simulated single-leg toe-raises with partial-weight support, requiring active muscle control.
Methods:
Subjects were each placed supine in a 1.5 T MRI and asked to repeat this simulated toe-raise while a full sagittal-cine-phase contrast (dynamic) MRI dataset was acquired. From the cine-phase contrast velocity a full kinematic description for each joint was derived.
Results:
Nearly all motion quantified at the calcaneal-tibial joint was attributable to the talocrural joint. The subtalar IHA orientation and position were highly variable; whereas, the talocrural IHA orientation and position were extremely consistent.
Conclusion:
The talocrural was well described by the IHA and could be modeled as a fixed-hinge joint, whereas the subtalar could not be.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Frances Sheehan</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-07-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-13</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-07-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/12">
        <title>The rheumatoid foot: a systematic literature review of patient reported outcome measures</title>
        <description>Background:
The foot is often the first area of the body to be systematically affected by rheumatoid arthritis. The multidimensional consequences of foot problems for patients can be subjectively evaluated using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, there is currently no systematic review which has focused specifically upon the PROMs available for the foot with rheumatoid arthritis. The aim of this systematic review was to appraise the foot-specific PROMs available for the assessment and/or evaluation of the foot affected with rheumatoid arthritis.
Methods:
A systematic search of databases was conducted according to pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. PROMs identified were reviewed in terms of: conceptual bases, quality of construction, measurement aims and evidence to support their measurement properties.
Results:
A total of 11 PROMs were identified and 5 papers that provided evidence for the measurement properties of some of the PROMs. Only one of the PROMs was found to be RA disease-specific. The quality of construction, pretesting and presence of evidence for their measurement properties was found to be highly variable. Conceptual bases of many of the PROMs was either restricted or based on reductionist biomedical models. All of the PROMs were found to consist of fixed scales.
Conclusions:
There is a need to develop an RA-disease and foot-specific PROM with a greater emphasis on a biopsychosocial conceptual basis, cognitive pre-testing methods, patient preference-based qualities and evidence to support the full complement of measurement properties.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Steven Walmsley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anita Williams</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mike Ravey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrea Graham</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-07-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-12</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-07-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/11">
        <title>Reliability of the TekScan MatScan(R) system for the measurement of plantar forces and pressures during barefoot level walking in healthy adults</title>
        <description>Background:
Plantar pressure systems are increasingly being used to evaluate foot function in both research settings and in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of the TekScan MatScan&#174; system in assessing plantar forces and pressures during barefoot level walking.
Methods:
Thirty participants were assessed for the reliability of measurements taken one week apart for the variables maximum force, peak pressure and average pressure. The following seven regions of the foot were investigated; heel, midfoot, 3rd-5th metatarsophalangeal joint, 2nd metatarsophalangeal joint, 1st metatarsophalangeal joint, hallux and the lesser toes.
Results:
Reliability was assessed using both the mean and the median values of three repeated trials. The system displayed moderate to good reliability of mean and median calculations for the three analysed variables across all seven regions, as indicated by intra-class correlation coefficients ranging from 0.44 to 0.95 for the mean and 0.54 to 0.97 for the median, and coefficients of variation ranging from 5 to 20% for the mean and 3 to 23% for the median. Selecting the median value of three repeated trials yielded slightly more reliable results than the mean.
Conclusions:
These findings indicate that the TekScan MatScan&#174; system demonstrates generally moderate to good reliability.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Gerard Zammit</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hylton Menz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shannon Munteanu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-06-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-11</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-06-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/10">
        <title>Improvement in symptoms and signs in the forefoot of patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with anti-TNF therapy</title>
        <description>Background:
Inhibition of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) is an effective way of reducing synovitis and preventing joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), yet very little is known about its specific effect on foot pain and disability. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether anti-TNF therapy alters the presence of forefoot pathology and/or reduces foot pain and disability.
Methods:
Consecutive RA patients starting anti-TNF therapy (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab) were assessed for presence of synovial hypertrophy and synovitis in the 2nd and 5th metatarso-phalangeal (MTP) joints and plantar forefoot bursal hypertrophy before and 12 weeks after therapy. Tender MTP joints and swollen bursae were established clinically by an experienced podiatrist and ultrasound (US) images were acquired and interpreted by a radiologist. Assessment of patient reported disease impact on the foot was performed using the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index (MFPDI).
Results:
31 patients (24 female, 7 male) with RA (12 seronegative, 19 seropositive) completed the study: mean age 59.6 (SD 10.1) years, disease duration 11.1 (SD 10.5) years, and previous number of Disease Modifying Anti Rheumatic Drugs 3.0 (1.6). Significant differences after therapy were found for Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (t = 4.014, p &lt; 0.001), C-reactive protein (t = 3.889, p = 0.001), 28 joint Disease Activity Score (t = 3.712, p = 0.0001), Visual Analog Scale (t = 2.735, p = 0.011) and Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index (t = 3.712, p = 0.001).Presence of MTP joint synovial hypertrophy on US was noted in 67.5% of joints at baseline and 54.8% of joints at twelve weeks. Presence of plantar forefoot bursal hypertrophy on US was noted in 83.3% of feet at baseline and 75% at twelve weeks. Although there was a trend for reduction in observed presence of person specific forefoot pathology, when the frequencies were analysed (McNemar) this was not significant.
Conclusions:
Significant improvements were seen in patient reported foot pain and disability 12 weeks after commencing TNF inhibition in RA, but this may not be enough time to detect changes in forefoot pathology.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Catherine Bowen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Edwards</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hooper Lindsey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Keith Dewbury</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Madeleine Sampson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sally Sawyer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jane Burridge</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nigel Arden</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-06-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-10</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-06-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/9">
        <title>Relationships between foot type and dynamic rearfoot frontal 
plane motion</title>
        <description>Background:
The Foot Posture Index (FPI) provides an easily applicable, validated method for quantifying static foot posture. However there is limited evidence relating to the ability of the FPI to predict dynamic foot function. This study aimed to assess the relationship between dynamic rearfoot motion and FPI scores in pronated and normal foot types.
Methods:
40 participants were recruited with equal numbers of pronated and normal foot types as classified by their FPI score. Three dimensional rearfoot motion was collected for each of the participants. Dynamic maximum rearfoot eversion was correlated with the total FPI score across all participants and within the normal and pronated foot types. Linear correlations were performed between components of the total FPI scores measuring frontal plane rearfoot position and maximum rearfoot eversion. The capacity of the total FPI score to predict maximum frontal plane motion of the rearfoot was investigated using linear regression analysis.
Results:
The correlation between the total FPI score and maximum rearfoot eversion was strongly positive (r = 0.92, p &lt; 0.05). Correlation performed on data subsets demonstrated the pronated foot type (FPI = +6 to +9) and maximum rearfoot eversion angle were more strongly positively correlated (r = 0.81, p &lt; 0.05) than the normal foot type (FPI = 0 to +5) and maximum rearfoot eversion (r = 0.76, p &lt; 0.05). Correlations between frontal plane rearfoot FPI score and frontal plane motion during gait were strongly positive, (r = 0.79 p &lt; 0.05 pronated group, r = 0.71 p &lt; 0.05 normal group), however were less strong than the total FPI score and rearfoot motion. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant and strong relationship between the total FPI score and maximum rearfoot eversion (r2 = 0.85, p &lt; 0.001).
Conclusions:
The results of this study suggest the FPI has strong predictive ability for dynamic rearfoot function. This will assist in clinical screening and research by allowing easy classification by functional foot type. Positive correlations between frontal plane rearfoot measurements and maximum rearfoot eversion suggest the FPI may identify dominant planar components of dynamic rearfoot motion and warrants further investigation.</description>
        <link>http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/3/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Vivienne Chuter</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-06-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-9</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1757-1146</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-06-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
